Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-28 16:00:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B3EFA2352A688ED6FF59BFB83A3FC9175F80F1F4100D2FF545C8BFF31469DA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was the judge’s choice to accept the assessment as the true value of the property. The fact that the $18m valuation originated from a tax assessment is irrelevant. The rest of the post is opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707424209155260843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B3EFA2352A688ED6FF59BFB83A3FC9175F80F1F4100D2FF545C8BFF31469DA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1695916852483
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17074242091552608439B3EFA2352A688ED6FF59BFB83A3FC9175F80F1F4100D2FF545C8BFF31469DA4