Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-27 09:36:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACE5CBF33FC40C8CE468181C48DD1A558735290D7747B9B0305E77B224E14CA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

リンク先の記事には「大法廷は年内に決定で憲法判断を示す見込み。」と書いてあり、あたかも判決が出たかのようなポストの見出しは誤解を招くものといえます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1706936650503438536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACE5CBF33FC40C8CE468181C48DD1A558735290D7747B9B0305E77B224E14CA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1695807371513
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1706936650503438536ACE5CBF33FC40C8CE468181C48DD1A558735290D7747B9B0305E77B224E14CA2