Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-27 23:30:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51F66C044A55DC9228136F25C6752B9DF9FACC52C191C8FB63DFAA83A78132B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is rubbish, but the proposed note doesn’t add useful clarification or context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1706772052743446809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51F66C044A55DC9228136F25C6752B9DF9FACC52C191C8FB63DFAA83A78132B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1695857447719
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170677205274344680951F66C044A55DC9228136F25C6752B9DF9FACC52C191C8FB63DFAA83A78132B6