Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-27 05:26:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A
Participant Details

Original Note:

&hyphen-minus; Gegner war Twitter, nicht eine "AchbesserCrew" - Inhalte von Tweets unter dem Hashtag #AchbesserCrew oder einzelner Nutzer waren nicht Verfahrensgegenstand https://landgericht-karlsruhe.justiz-bw.de/pb/,Lde/16549618/?LISTPAGE=1160343

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1706681230614200325
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A
  • createdAtMillis - 1695792361671
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 170668123061420032551A208310029F328098C5CFC8FF40D77CC42FEB8305EA5554D5060A92AF3075A