Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-26 12:49:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C76ACBC707B2F939893565649529FB0B580B2E0AA3170C9081DE4C5F127F060
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper clarifies in a footnote that this comparison cannot be made from the table: "...SARS-CoV-2 infection was treated as a time-varying exposure allowing individuals to contribute with uninfected (reference) period time prior to the SARS-CoV-2 infection date" https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad531

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1706571665537421746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C76ACBC707B2F939893565649529FB0B580B2E0AA3170C9081DE4C5F127F060
  • createdAtMillis - 1695732556689
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17065716655374217460C76ACBC707B2F939893565649529FB0B580B2E0AA3170C9081DE4C5F127F060