Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-24 12:24:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED31CB5BD07FF64424AC840E7F3187AC982F2B045AE7E9AFAC7421BCB5796899
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The image in question is clearly labeled in the article as a "before" haircut picture-- this is the hairstyle being disputed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705781130681889001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED31CB5BD07FF64424AC840E7F3187AC982F2B045AE7E9AFAC7421BCB5796899
  • createdAtMillis - 1695558281792
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1705781130681889001ED31CB5BD07FF64424AC840E7F3187AC982F2B045AE7E9AFAC7421BCB5796899