Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-24 12:32:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E26EAF3A7F9A280104CBDE137529CED161782D9605CAE72A540E7291E4CD86C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN so far. All existing notes attack the source or reference opinion. Ad hominems are logical fallacies. There is no solid proof one way or another. If you disagree but have no actual evidence to counter the claim, post a comment instead.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705573137750851595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E26EAF3A7F9A280104CBDE137529CED161782D9605CAE72A540E7291E4CD86C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1695558775852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1705573137750851595E26EAF3A7F9A280104CBDE137529CED161782D9605CAE72A540E7291E4CD86C3