Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-23 16:46:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC4D047AD3406CD749D50503024EE013A3A4E5078D8B932F315305896E5F5F66
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN so far. All existing notes attack the source or reference opinion. Ad hominems are logical fallacies. There is no solid proof one way or another. If you disagree but have no actual evidence to counter the claim, post a comment instead.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705573137750851595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC4D047AD3406CD749D50503024EE013A3A4E5078D8B932F315305896E5F5F66
  • createdAtMillis - 1695487584227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1705573137750851595AC4D047AD3406CD749D50503024EE013A3A4E5078D8B932F315305896E5F5F66