Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-23 20:18:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6295B9F66AFA142F2E0F19ED1FAAE8254096D2E8439C1F49B1C4DC5A185E8F02
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN so far. All existing notes attack the source or reference opinion. Ad hominems are logical fallacies. There is no solid proof one way or another. If you disagree but have no actual evidence to counter the claim, post a comment instead.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705573137750851595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6295B9F66AFA142F2E0F19ED1FAAE8254096D2E8439C1F49B1C4DC5A185E8F02
  • createdAtMillis - 1695500331914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17055731377508515956295B9F66AFA142F2E0F19ED1FAAE8254096D2E8439C1F49B1C4DC5A185E8F02