Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-23 09:59:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Study cited in the misleading proposed note does not demonstrate the mixing historical data the tweet refers to, but at most might (emphasis) demonstrate current rates, among youths influenced by the current social contagion. Proposed note is intentionally misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705399925876424740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1695463143648
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1705399925876424740A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF