Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-23 02:47:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71
Participant Details

Original Note:

Study cited in the misleading proposed note does not demonstrate the mixing historical data the tweet refers to, but at most might (emphasis) demonstrate current rates, among youths influenced by the current social contagion. Proposed note is intentionally misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705399925876424740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71
  • createdAtMillis - 1695437223419
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1705399925876424740668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71