Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-23 03:08:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Study cited in the misleading proposed note does not demonstrate the mixing historical data the tweet refers to, but at most might (emphasis) demonstrate current rates, among youths influenced by the current social contagion. Proposed note is intentionally misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705399925876424740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1695438537080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170539992587642474036E85A5220A8C42926F5F77A184EFF5607CB7699173C5AC20D0EFF3E1E2401B2