Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-07 01:20:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FD80BB6B08E23A7A3FF64F0FE25B0A82A3F29E10600CE45D9C77F31BCE93C30
Participant Details

Original Note:

Study cited in the misleading proposed note does not demonstrate the mixing historical data the tweet refers to, but at most might (emphasis) demonstrate current rates, among youths influenced by the current social contagion. Proposed note is intentionally misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705399925876424740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FD80BB6B08E23A7A3FF64F0FE25B0A82A3F29E10600CE45D9C77F31BCE93C30
  • createdAtMillis - 1699320022800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17053999258764247400FD80BB6B08E23A7A3FF64F0FE25B0A82A3F29E10600CE45D9C77F31BCE93C30