Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-23 10:41:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 203A514A11D8E9E2E772F898671E8B76CFB47DB4016D637F531ACB4F0478E36A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. L’autrice critique la méthode d’évaluation de l’EFSA, qui peut se débattre en commentaire. Critique qui ne lui est pas propre (financement industriel des études, manque de transparence, études limitées): https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/129380/PH%20Glyphosate_Pigeon.pdf https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2022/09/16/quelles-suites-depuis-l-enquete-monsanto-papers_6141912_3244.html https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorité_européenne_de_sécurité_des_aliments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1705361283749413109
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 203A514A11D8E9E2E772F898671E8B76CFB47DB4016D637F531ACB4F0478E36A
  • createdAtMillis - 1695465706248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1705361283749413109203A514A11D8E9E2E772F898671E8B76CFB47DB4016D637F531ACB4F0478E36A