Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-19 13:02:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4672EC8465D6640FF9DAA4C26A408FA8E439AA02C8735C17CB9D102653849CE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per CL-2019-0002911: The plaintiff, Johnny Depp, had the burden to prove defamation with malice. In order to do that, they had to prove that the statements were FALSE. They did. The defendant was found liable & acted with actual malice. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703879793559863598
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4672EC8465D6640FF9DAA4C26A408FA8E439AA02C8735C17CB9D102653849CE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1695128537236
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17038797935598635984672EC8465D6640FF9DAA4C26A408FA8E439AA02C8735C17CB9D102653849CE6