Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-19 08:43:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF693D1AD41724E5A4EEBF6F418C4A8F82A144FAFE26A2A4D391A3A87DB3BB19
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, El dato aportado es real y contrastable, y es indiferente respecto al porcentaje que supone de condenas revisadas. Para extrapolar conclusiones cualitativamente distintas no incompatibles con el tuit está la sección de respuestas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703842300919419100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF693D1AD41724E5A4EEBF6F418C4A8F82A144FAFE26A2A4D391A3A87DB3BB19
  • createdAtMillis - 1695112993783
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703842300919419100FF693D1AD41724E5A4EEBF6F418C4A8F82A144FAFE26A2A4D391A3A87DB3BB19