Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-19 06:28:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFFB502A21C62AC0326AAA7D87BFC64E4BA5B242754238EA03C0123FBEBA5AD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, El dato aportado es real y contrastable, y es indiferente respecto al porcentaje que supone de condenas revisadas. Para extrapolar conclusiones cualitativamente distintas no incompatibles con el tuit está la sección de respuestas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703842300919419100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFFB502A21C62AC0326AAA7D87BFC64E4BA5B242754238EA03C0123FBEBA5AD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1695104912505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703842300919419100CFFB502A21C62AC0326AAA7D87BFC64E4BA5B242754238EA03C0123FBEBA5AD9