Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-18 19:09:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C15ECD14D26A07D61461302F370C81944DA482DE031B6A494731A3B64A38547D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, El dato aportado es real y contrastable, y es indiferente respecto al porcentaje que supone de condenas revisadas. Para extrapolar conclusiones cualitativamente distintas no incompatibles con el tuit está la sección de respuestas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703842300919419100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C15ECD14D26A07D61461302F370C81944DA482DE031B6A494731A3B64A38547D
  • createdAtMillis - 1695064150437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703842300919419100C15ECD14D26A07D61461302F370C81944DA482DE031B6A494731A3B64A38547D