Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-18 18:55:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8AEB4F66488E0340C6E684F3F13A4FB14641415110EE9B3586F6B5D2BC9E3586
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, El dato aportado es real y contrastable, y es indiferente respecto al porcentaje que supone de condenas revisadas. Para extrapolar conclusiones cualitativamente distintas no incompatibles con el tuit está la sección de respuestas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703842300919419100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8AEB4F66488E0340C6E684F3F13A4FB14641415110EE9B3586F6B5D2BC9E3586
  • createdAtMillis - 1695063345870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17038423009194191008AEB4F66488E0340C6E684F3F13A4FB14641415110EE9B3586F6B5D2BC9E3586