Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-20 22:03:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C292A66A97A1E2901BBDB1FF0E9FFD66EF49C9778B43C1DA3A391771B8979F36
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Brand is refuting sexual harassment/rape claims which to date have been based on circumstantial evidence - claims he believes stem from him speaking out against the establishment. He’s expressing an opinion, refuting an opinion formed or because of … his opinions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703752916891209906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C292A66A97A1E2901BBDB1FF0E9FFD66EF49C9778B43C1DA3A391771B8979F36
  • createdAtMillis - 1695247410182
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703752916891209906C292A66A97A1E2901BBDB1FF0E9FFD66EF49C9778B43C1DA3A391771B8979F36