Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 22:48:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E5FCD2AFC001DC80BDC2F3ECF39ECC2165E56D68F7C0AC30EC3294E49FB560F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The writers of the article had enough information to know that it was not an accident, but a malicious attack. They chose to disregard the facts when they printed the first article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703444176099274928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E5FCD2AFC001DC80BDC2F3ECF39ECC2165E56D68F7C0AC30EC3294E49FB560F
  • createdAtMillis - 1694990905251
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17034441760992749289E5FCD2AFC001DC80BDC2F3ECF39ECC2165E56D68F7C0AC30EC3294E49FB560F