Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 12:46:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB2E2293D08E97DB29C7EEAEB7763F9DDC89E4DAC554E1671B760932134E0A01
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Even the article in the proposed note admits there are serious flaws in the Neilsen rating system. Criticizing the tweet for citing numbers from a flawed system without also noting that the system it is being compared to is equally flawed is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703384181508575308
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB2E2293D08E97DB29C7EEAEB7763F9DDC89E4DAC554E1671B760932134E0A01
  • createdAtMillis - 1694954788449
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703384181508575308BB2E2293D08E97DB29C7EEAEB7763F9DDC89E4DAC554E1671B760932134E0A01