Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 20:52:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DEC04F822722F113F9F5BF92299FF8AEE3C79E3B2A1C93FC56B533082882053
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Even the article in the proposed note admits there are serious flaws in the Neilsen rating system. Criticizing the tweet for citing numbers from a flawed system without also noting that the system it is being compared to is equally flawed is misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703384181508575308
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DEC04F822722F113F9F5BF92299FF8AEE3C79E3B2A1C93FC56B533082882053
  • createdAtMillis - 1694983928123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17033841815085753088DEC04F822722F113F9F5BF92299FF8AEE3C79E3B2A1C93FC56B533082882053