Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 14:46:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 1st C.N. defends the paper & it's later correction. Evidence immediately available would have proven the victim was struck by a car in a hit-and-run. They suspects struck-and-fled from another car that was being driven, one block earlier. This was just bad journalism. https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxO50mhyYRP/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703353485960294517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1694962018513
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703353485960294517481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0