Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 11:47:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47719A160301AA3C625C4CC86BE3F8BF794919B3776862F2FE7E522055AA4F3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 1st C.N. defends the paper & it's later correction. Evidence immediately available would have proven the victim was struck by a car in a hit-and-run. They suspects struck-and-fled from another car that was being driven, one block earlier. This was just bad journalism. https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxO50mhyYRP/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703353485960294517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47719A160301AA3C625C4CC86BE3F8BF794919B3776862F2FE7E522055AA4F3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1694951270505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170335348596029451747719A160301AA3C625C4CC86BE3F8BF794919B3776862F2FE7E522055AA4F3F