Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 10:34:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0DD0A1176A473F7E276672E89AFD6A43508AA34A66D342E4F1408CE9FE0E0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It's clearly an opinion and any argument belongs to the comments. Doesn't matter if the new article brings more information. The old article was published so nothing misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703310957642932609
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0DD0A1176A473F7E276672E89AFD6A43508AA34A66D342E4F1408CE9FE0E0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1694946881503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1703310957642932609B0DD0A1176A473F7E276672E89AFD6A43508AA34A66D342E4F1408CE9FE0E0BE