Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 08:58:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F3012E5A473FD08F39332DC8E541F11AD7E6C6F9829E43F6372F6B7787E0476
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It's clearly an opinion and any argument belongs to the comments. Doesn't matter if the new article brings more information. The old article was published so nothing misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1703310957642932609
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F3012E5A473FD08F39332DC8E541F11AD7E6C6F9829E43F6372F6B7787E0476
  • createdAtMillis - 1694941087577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17033109576429326092F3012E5A473FD08F39332DC8E541F11AD7E6C6F9829E43F6372F6B7787E0476