Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-17 15:30:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EECC81A329B48E3A707FF5F9C6B52852C401ED8CAF0EB920DFA4B1A421E04C4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note is not needed as it was already provided in the comments, and the community note seems to be doubting its a genuine study due to its sample size, however a sample size of around 1000 is generally good for a study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702779947285119456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EECC81A329B48E3A707FF5F9C6B52852C401ED8CAF0EB920DFA4B1A421E04C4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1694964658421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1702779947285119456EECC81A329B48E3A707FF5F9C6B52852C401ED8CAF0EB920DFA4B1A421E04C4F