Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-16 14:31:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E57B88425E42E963416E515FDED906BC55B156C9C78C192EEE1D3BF822A50DB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note is not needed as it was already provided in the comments, and the community note seems to be doubting its a genuine study due to its sample size, however a sample size of around 1000 is generally good for a study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702779947285119456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E57B88425E42E963416E515FDED906BC55B156C9C78C192EEE1D3BF822A50DB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1694874694155
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1702779947285119456E57B88425E42E963416E515FDED906BC55B156C9C78C192EEE1D3BF822A50DB9