Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 21:36:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C0A98913E36A304DB09E2E59149096216CA483DFBC77D499A56654F83C3A09B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The pro-Depp note referencing the jury verdict ignores the settlement the two agreed to, where Heard's insurance company, Travelers, agreed to pay him $1M, on the condition that there's no malice. And, If there's no malice, his lawsuit is meritless (a.k.a. nullification): https://twitter.com/CharlesLKuyper/status/1672755481582919687

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702668921977856233
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C0A98913E36A304DB09E2E59149096216CA483DFBC77D499A56654F83C3A09B
  • createdAtMillis - 1709847386079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17026689219778562335C0A98913E36A304DB09E2E59149096216CA483DFBC77D499A56654F83C3A09B