Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-15 13:04:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 347DA398373F687BE8D92247120F904BE81693F86BD4FDDE73B26E4CB3D80D2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The pro-Depp note referencing the jury verdict ignores the settlement the two agreed to, where Heard's insurance company, Travelers, agreed to pay him $1M, on the condition that there's no malice. And, If there's no malice, his lawsuit is meritless (a.k.a. nullification): https://twitter.com/CharlesLKuyper/status/1672755481582919687

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702668921977856233
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 347DA398373F687BE8D92247120F904BE81693F86BD4FDDE73B26E4CB3D80D2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1694783054520
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1702668921977856233347DA398373F687BE8D92247120F904BE81693F86BD4FDDE73B26E4CB3D80D2D