Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-14 12:24:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00D165632B2761BF19BA9BCCA3ADFC7219E62F92F5ADCCB467D71FA335E1C640
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Argue with him in the comments! He can make the claim based on the 4 studies, whether they are good or bad quality is up for discussion, not a fact. Quality of links given in Notes is also very low.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702287205337633093
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00D165632B2761BF19BA9BCCA3ADFC7219E62F92F5ADCCB467D71FA335E1C640
  • createdAtMillis - 1694694279420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170228720533763309300D165632B2761BF19BA9BCCA3ADFC7219E62F92F5ADCCB467D71FA335E1C640