Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-14 01:52:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F6D215030CB183C1A4FBD21DA80CEF3673CB02BBF112F2AE091DB8ECB9C5542
Participant Details

Original Note:

いわゆる「遅効性アレルギー検査」は医学的に有用性が確認されていません。米国や欧州のアレルギー学会および日本小児アレルギー学会では、食物アレルギーにおけるIgG抗体の診断的有用性を公式に否定しています。 https://www.jsaweb.jp/modules/important/index.php?content_id=51 https://www.nhk.or.jp/seikatsu-blog/300/219018.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702132160541651112
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F6D215030CB183C1A4FBD21DA80CEF3673CB02BBF112F2AE091DB8ECB9C5542
  • createdAtMillis - 1694656351581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17021321605416511127F6D215030CB183C1A4FBD21DA80CEF3673CB02BBF112F2AE091DB8ECB9C5542