Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 23:06:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3B98B4E9BC8EA891D313FB8E0588B11606D0CDC709ADBDD9CCB085D9D2D0288
Participant Details

Original Note:

Non seulement le tweet ne comporte pas la mention « présumé coupable », donc la note proposée ment, mais de plus ce n'est pas parce qu'il existe un jargon judiciaire que tout un chacun est obligé de l'adopter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702012715294662897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3B98B4E9BC8EA891D313FB8E0588B11606D0CDC709ADBDD9CCB085D9D2D0288
  • createdAtMillis - 1694646384534
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1702012715294662897D3B98B4E9BC8EA891D313FB8E0588B11606D0CDC709ADBDD9CCB085D9D2D0288