Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 18:38:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4192B2D656A70A8FB59A9EDF8FC5AFD0ACBFB7D204CF26CB1F264A0A1168C0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note claims this was taken out of context. It wasn't. Just because she asking New Yorkers to get an updated booster doesn't mean that she didn't also state the exact quoted language. Both those can be--and are--completely accurate (and in context).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702010858216337830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4192B2D656A70A8FB59A9EDF8FC5AFD0ACBFB7D204CF26CB1F264A0A1168C0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1694630295290
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1702010858216337830E4192B2D656A70A8FB59A9EDF8FC5AFD0ACBFB7D204CF26CB1F264A0A1168C0C