Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 21:19:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56136A57E328FDC9A0CBE826324A7C36CA9F8C0AE12CE2582A0FD71ADF8B810D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note claims this was taken out of context. It wasn't. Just because she asking New Yorkers to get an updated booster doesn't mean that she didn't also state the exact quoted language. Both those can be--and are--completely accurate (and in context).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702010858216337830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56136A57E328FDC9A0CBE826324A7C36CA9F8C0AE12CE2582A0FD71ADF8B810D
  • createdAtMillis - 1694639949819
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170201085821633783056136A57E328FDC9A0CBE826324A7C36CA9F8C0AE12CE2582A0FD71ADF8B810D