Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 22:53:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C345B187B8A2973469A4699EB71A76CEC9A6A9A14D19D899ACAC49E7DF6A4CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note claims this was taken out of context. It wasn't. Just because she asking New Yorkers to get an updated booster doesn't mean that she didn't also state the exact quoted language. Both those can be--and are--completely accurate (and in context).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702010858216337830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C345B187B8A2973469A4699EB71A76CEC9A6A9A14D19D899ACAC49E7DF6A4CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1694645627342
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17020108582163378303C345B187B8A2973469A4699EB71A76CEC9A6A9A14D19D899ACAC49E7DF6A4CE