Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-14 03:29:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E3957C974EB4FEC4E7CB7C3B16A31AD6EC8ECDA54BDBA747D1A3FB742F8F78B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note claims this was taken out of context. It wasn't. Just because she asking New Yorkers to get an updated booster doesn't mean that she didn't also state the exact quoted language. Both those can be--and are--completely accurate (and in context).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1702010858216337830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E3957C974EB4FEC4E7CB7C3B16A31AD6EC8ECDA54BDBA747D1A3FB742F8F78B
  • createdAtMillis - 1694662174176
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17020108582163378300E3957C974EB4FEC4E7CB7C3B16A31AD6EC8ECDA54BDBA747D1A3FB742F8F78B