Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 19:28:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B426593D6F71DCEA43E5BC2A6E9D99ED99A5020B595335A66C1A23E19B59A635
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il post si riferisce a uno studio condotto in Germania e GB e i risultati potrebbero non essere generalizzabili in altri Paesi. Gli autori riconoscono questa limitazione e suggeriscono che studi futuri dovrebbero utilizzare misure più oggettive di rilevamento delle fake news. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-34402-6#Sec6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701922095721017352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B426593D6F71DCEA43E5BC2A6E9D99ED99A5020B595335A66C1A23E19B59A635
  • createdAtMillis - 1694633324115
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1701922095721017352B426593D6F71DCEA43E5BC2A6E9D99ED99A5020B595335A66C1A23E19B59A635