Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-16 12:59:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0AA028719DDFEAD4CA5410BBE9A1A8DA09EB4F98FA7C01246777B9D8BCA065F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il post si riferisce a uno studio condotto in Germania e GB e i risultati potrebbero non essere generalizzabili in altri Paesi. Gli autori riconoscono questa limitazione e suggeriscono che studi futuri dovrebbero utilizzare misure più oggettive di rilevamento delle fake news. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-34402-6#Sec6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701922095721017352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0AA028719DDFEAD4CA5410BBE9A1A8DA09EB4F98FA7C01246777B9D8BCA065F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1694869159620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17019220957210173520AA028719DDFEAD4CA5410BBE9A1A8DA09EB4F98FA7C01246777B9D8BCA065F8