Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 18:51:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F66CB5313EF4966579B09C7E27B2C239AB0508ABC2D35A239F4470FE80E9E165
Participant Details

Original Note:

Parmi les signataires, et à côté de certains experts de la question nucléaire, on trouve un nombre significatif de psychologues, sociologues, interprètes, botanistes, historiens, etc. non nécessairement compétents pour parler de physique et énergie nucléaire. https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701886935642378678
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F66CB5313EF4966579B09C7E27B2C239AB0508ABC2D35A239F4470FE80E9E165
  • createdAtMillis - 1694631081310
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1701886935642378678F66CB5313EF4966579B09C7E27B2C239AB0508ABC2D35A239F4470FE80E9E165