Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 14:11:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F367476A6E04872601ACD3975DF65B41643577D66DBE82C43E9865B42C1434D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Parmi les signataires, et à côté de certains experts de la question nucléaire, on trouve un nombre significatif de psychologues, sociologues, interprètes, botanistes, historiens, etc. non nécessairement compétents pour parler de physique et énergie nucléaire. https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701886935642378678
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F367476A6E04872601ACD3975DF65B41643577D66DBE82C43E9865B42C1434D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1694614307078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1701886935642378678F367476A6E04872601ACD3975DF65B41643577D66DBE82C43E9865B42C1434D2