Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-14 05:11:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8DFE14E2E103EB7CF1F6974F40E61672427F71ED9FECC49FF670860602E7D6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Parmi les signataires, et à côté de certains experts de la question nucléaire, on trouve un nombre significatif de psychologues, sociologues, interprètes, botanistes, historiens, etc. non nécessairement compétents pour parler de physique et énergie nucléaire. https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1701886935642378678
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E8DFE14E2E103EB7CF1F6974F40E61672427F71ED9FECC49FF670860602E7D6A
createdAtMillis - 1694668267220
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1701886935642378678E8DFE14E2E103EB7CF1F6974F40E61672427F71ED9FECC49FF670860602E7D6A