Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-14 11:33:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAC770AE1E483B4C5B3010965D15517E66EDC0D6673289E55B080BE59A292BC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Parmi les signataires, et à côté de certains experts de la question nucléaire, on trouve un nombre significatif de psychologues, sociologues, interprètes, botanistes, historiens, etc. non nécessairement compétents pour parler de physique et énergie nucléaire. https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1701886935642378678
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BAC770AE1E483B4C5B3010965D15517E66EDC0D6673289E55B080BE59A292BC6
createdAtMillis - 1694691195246
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1701886935642378678BAC770AE1E483B4C5B3010965D15517E66EDC0D6673289E55B080BE59A292BC6