Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-13 18:32:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C108FAED88D3176EED03536008C4511399A7AA9598BD22477C9F8A60CAF3FF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Parmi les signataires, et à côté de certains experts de la question nucléaire, on trouve un nombre significatif de psychologues, sociologues, interprètes, botanistes, historiens, etc. non nécessairement compétents pour parler de physique et énergie nucléaire. https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1701886935642378678
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4C108FAED88D3176EED03536008C4511399A7AA9598BD22477C9F8A60CAF3FF9
createdAtMillis - 1694629972760
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17018869356423786784C108FAED88D3176EED03536008C4511399A7AA9598BD22477C9F8A60CAF3FF9