Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-12 12:29:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F158861F63AD33D79A8990783DE1B2F4E0E6CC60023A7FCA8AACA150E1350E9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no such article from Reuters or any other outlet to be found online.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701566080626397560
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F158861F63AD33D79A8990783DE1B2F4E0E6CC60023A7FCA8AACA150E1350E9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1694521740913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1701566080626397560F158861F63AD33D79A8990783DE1B2F4E0E6CC60023A7FCA8AACA150E1350E9A