Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-12 01:41:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2212BB453C8609ABC556C3788E0B81074C13E13FC8B49B6CFD4D435C777E268C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post specifically states that those are the numbers he testified to in a proceeding. The post is correct. Gableman did in fact use those numbers in his testimony. https://tennesseestar.com/justice/explosive-testimony-from-former-wisconsin-supreme-court-justice-at-disbarment-trial-of-trumps-attorney-john-eastman/rachel-alexander/2023/09/08/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701280152054100216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2212BB453C8609ABC556C3788E0B81074C13E13FC8B49B6CFD4D435C777E268C
  • createdAtMillis - 1694482918450
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17012801520541002162212BB453C8609ABC556C3788E0B81074C13E13FC8B49B6CFD4D435C777E268C