Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-11 22:03:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The referendum is not specifically for constitutional recognition as this post claims, but for recognition "by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice". The distinction between recognition and a voice is politically contentious and should be noted. https://voice.gov.au/referendum-2023/referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701136773068542240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1694469818233
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1701136773068542240A4F4264C8742E20C37623E804E53ED6F2D3FAD97D9AF894FA37FE033C139F8EF