Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-11 12:43:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37920FBC7788CDB7333EDDE4E64F2ECD41B740BFE92F45B87D68CF200DED166C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post doesn't include quotes around the term "collusion" to indicate the word can be in the document. Rather, they are using a common term to describe the ruling in their own words. It's factually correct, so NNN. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/23/23-30445-CV0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1701053774930808891
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37920FBC7788CDB7333EDDE4E64F2ECD41B740BFE92F45B87D68CF200DED166C
  • createdAtMillis - 1694436206361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170105377493080889137920FBC7788CDB7333EDDE4E64F2ECD41B740BFE92F45B87D68CF200DED166C