Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-10 19:12:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E88C91CB596816B1E92C7CA8B67DB6FBBA15C8C0F9BAC71D63C0F3532A8917F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling does not speak about collusion. In fact, the word does not appear once. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/23/23-30445-CV0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1700893078712660064
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E88C91CB596816B1E92C7CA8B67DB6FBBA15C8C0F9BAC71D63C0F3532A8917F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1694373174342
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1700893078712660064E88C91CB596816B1E92C7CA8B67DB6FBBA15C8C0F9BAC71D63C0F3532A8917F3